Comments on: Jim Corr’s “amazing radio rant” about 9/11 and Lisbon

By: johnathan mcauliffe

johnathan mcauliffe — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:52:37 +0000

jim is dead right, the amount of evidence for a controlled demolition. 1. no jets scrambled until after the fact.
2. war games on 911 , thirteen in fact.
3.no investigation into the crime for two years. budget for comission ten times less than bill clintons blow job case.
3. evidence shipped overseas to be melted down without investiation.
4.witnesses confirm explosions going off inside the towers. Willie Rodriquez trade tower janitor confirms this.
5. three steel buildings fall confetti from the sky all on the same day. buildings were practically dust before they hit the ground.
6. Frank De Martini architect for trade stated buildings could sustain MULTIPLE impacts from jetliners. conviently frank de martini ded in the towers.

By: NiallOK

NiallOK — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:52:09 +0000

I refuse to confirm or deny that I am a crazy nut sitting in an insane asylum with broadband access… :p

By: Stephen

Stephen — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:05:03 +0000

Your research means nothing. It has not been peer reviewed by an upstanding trusted institution for all we know you could be a a crazy nut sitting in an insane asylum with broadband access

By: Stephen

Stephen — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:03:09 +0000

This argument reminds me of the Emperors New Clothes Story. If anybody disagrees with you they have a “tiny box of a brain”. There is no concrete evidence to support these claims

By: NiallOK

NiallOK — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:52:04 +0000

Yeah. I researched it well and I still think Jim Corr was full of crap.

And you disagree. ~shakes head~ oh Lizzy…

Oh and welcome to two years ago.

By: Lizzy

Lizzy — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:46:16 +0000

You “researched it well” and they sucked you in anyway? ~shakes head~ oh Niall…

By: David Quinn

David Quinn — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:59:31 +0000

Here is what Gore Vidal had to say on the story broken by the India Times, as well as covered by the Wall Street Journal: that fighter jets were, in fact, not scrambled on the morning of 9/11 to warn, redirect or shoot down the highjacked airliners:

“According to law, they all should have been up there. And not one went up,” Vidal, who’s father as director of the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Air Commerce, helped develop the Air Force procedures charged.

“Well, that could have only happen if somebody told them to stand down- not to respond to what was, after all, their sworn duty. “

By: NiallOK

NiallOK — Sat, 31 May 2008 14:29:12 +0000

… and after researching it well (particularly after reading the sites linked by “Basra” above – and the Debunking 9/11 site at http://www.debunking911.com/ ), I’ve put the words back in

By: Niall

Niall — Fri, 30 May 2008 15:39:16 +0000

In the interest of fairness, and after reading the comments of “notimportant”, above, I’ve struck out the the words “most of which have been comprehensively debunked” from my post and I retract those words as I freely admit that no, I haven’t researched the subject matter sufficiently to solidly make that claim here.

Other people have though…

I do, however, – like many others – hold the opposite view of Jim Corr, that 9/11 wasn’t a conspiracy by the US government and that the rest of what he claimed (bullet pointed in the post above) is simply untrue. He seems to me to have been suckered in by one of the many conspiracy theories that have been floating around the ‘net for the past few years.

Oh and anyone can post URLs…

http://blather.net/blather/2007/02/enough_is_enough_were_finally.html

By: Basra

Basra — Fri, 30 May 2008 14:30:31 +0000

You should check out Scholars for truth. http://st911.org They are a collection of over 80 scholars of architecture, many fields of science including physics, Engineering, etc.They believe that 9/11 was an inside job and have started their own international organization and some of them tour America and the world doing conferences on the subject.

Also Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth!
http://www.ae911truth.org/
They are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses — Word from the editor

The 6 years since 9/11/01 has given us the time and space to emerge from the hypnotic trance of the shocks of these attacks and to rationally evaluate the existing and new evidence that has become available.

9/11 was an inside Job! one only has to look at building 7. A child could tell you that was a controlled demolition. But then a child would have more courage to look with an open mind.